英國格拉斯頓伯里的音樂祭，作者沿路開車前往，拿出電磁波探測器，沿路竟然發出驚人的嗶嗶聲，與紅色閃光，顯示數值遠遠超出WHO可容忍範圍。當地人已經出現頭痛、流鼻血、眼睛刺痛、消化問題等現象。
代表英國政府已經推出5G了，就以這場音樂祭作起跑，目前先以郊區作實驗。整個執行作業『郊區優先(rural first)』；放到台灣，就是中南部優於北部，新北早於台北的意思。
5G系統公司不是華為，是一群合作夥伴，包括美國電信巨頭Cisco，Microsoft，BBC，與英國電信。也包括殼牌(Shell)間接參與。有230名科學家提出實驗結果，仍不為所動，執意推行。這些科學家也促請WHO將5G對身體健康的危險歸類拉高到與石綿與砷同級，但沒人聽進去。
為什麼沒有抗議活動？這年頭太多議題分頭進行，魚目混珠，真假難辨。在大家驚覺5G開始之前，還有氣候變遷降低碳排放量等大型的遊行活動，背後不排除是政府請演員策動的。而綠色組織的反應太慢太微弱(寡不敵眾的意思?? )。
所以5G………………..開始了…………
格拉斯頓伯里音樂節的觀眾在電磁波地雷區狂歡
By Annie Dieu-Le-Veut上週末，我們一群人開車去格拉斯頓伯里的音樂節。隨身帶有電磁場輻射探測器，持續發出驚人嗶嗶聲與紅色閃光，顯示出它檢測到的電磁波超出世界衛生組織建議的安全範圍。它們穿越經過該地方的主要道路，在古樸的小村莊Pilton有幾處熱門景點。
幾週前，我參加皮爾頓教區議會的會議。居民聚集在一個房間，對於在兒童滑板公園鋪設電訊設備，沒有事先徵詢他們的意見表達沮喪之意。工程師通知他們其中一人，5月底將鋪設好準備好5G系統，在音樂節舉行之際。
我們現在開始收到回報，裝設內部高度危險電磁波、伴隨頭痛、流鼻血、眼睛刺痛與消化問題。
5G在今年的音樂節鋪設在格拉斯頓伯里，是政府執行計畫的一部分，名為郊區優先。這是都市行銷人員夢想中的宣傳活動，以為能為國民提供更好的網路服務。但是事實上，好人付了250英鎊的錢，在一個1.4平方英里的地方安裝，讓自己成為未經檢驗技術的實驗鼠，這項技術可能對他們的健康產生嚴重影響。
5G郊區優先的合作夥伴包括美國電信巨頭思科，微軟，英國廣播公司與英國電信，優先把5G技術帶到格拉斯頓伯里音樂節。5G 郊區優先還包括奧克尼群島與什羅普郡，還聲稱這個技術有助乳牛表現更好。
但他們忽略掉230名科學家與醫生所提出的證據，呼籲世界衛生組織把5G無線訊號的致癌因子，從2B歸類升高到第1組，與石棉、砷等級危險。
他們認為5G對健康的危害，包括致癌風險增加，細胞壓力，有害的自由基，基因損傷，生殖系統的結構與功能性改變，學習與記憶缺陷，神經失調以及對整體健康的負面影響。而且傷害遠超出人類; 有更多證明顯示對植物，昆蟲與動物的傷害。
那麼抗議活動到哪裡去了？沒有阻止這種對我們健康福祉產生的威脅？
嗯，我們不能訴諸滅絕叛亂。上個月國家組織請演員來演出的抗議，抗議主題是氣候變遷，讓倫敦市中心處於不動狀態，內容是要在2050年前達到零碳排放量提供心靈與思想的支持。這是首相Theresa May在職位不保時所作的承諾，有意無意會讓這個國家在30年內破產。
其中一位滅絕叛逆創始人，董事蓋爾布拉德布魯克，繼續領導網民，擔任『數位策略專家，擔任很多客戶的諮詢，包括EE，倫敦連接與內閣辦公室。』還有一位前任埃克森美孚（Exxon Mobil）董事會成員，以及安東尼•都鐸勳爵，美林證券的高級顧問，以及殼牌的法律顧問。殼牌大舉投資在衛星與航太工業，涉及5G的推廣。
那麼綠色組織呢？當然他們會關心新技術要砍掉數以千計的樹木才能成功傳輸信號的事。嗯，凱洛琳盧卡很晚才加入開會。去年9月，她支持“智能計畫”，儘管綠色組織在評估安全風險之時考慮暫停。
格林斯頓伯里的議會，大多數是綠色組織的成員，一直在拖延這個議題。現在努力趕上當地基層的反5G運動，幾個月以來奮力注意這個議題。但是，力量太小，時間太晚。我們週日發現的電磁波最糟的熱門景點之一，是我們開車要進入Chalice Well Gardens的入口處，在入城之前。
格拉斯頓伯里鎮議會不負責音樂祭所在地Pilton，有自己的教區，這是為什麼我們很多人幾週前參加他們的教區會議。但沒有任何差別。
音樂祭的農民創始人邁克艾維斯（Michael Eavis），女兒艾艾蜜莉（Emily）現在負責這項為期四天的活動，前幾天在特易購（Tesco），一個發傳單的人，對她感到不悅回答說「年輕人是主因。我敢說你一定有電話(手機?)。」
她從皮包拿出不是智能手機，而是過時的諾基亞，她回應他這只是應急用。
艾維斯那時告訴她，他完全沒手機。想做什麼就做甚麼。
Glastonbury Festival-Goers are raveling in a EMF minefield
By Annie Dieu-Le-Veut
Last weekend, a group of us drove around the site of Glastonbury Festival in Pilton, Somerset. We had an electromagnetic field radiation detector that was continually bleeping alarmingly and flashing red, indicating that the EMFs it was detecting were way above World Health Organisation recommended safety levels. They were penetrating on to the main road which runs past the site, and there were several hotspots in the quaint little village of Pilton itself, including the village hall and the Working Men’s Club.
A couple of weeks before, I had attended a meeting of Pilton’s parish council. It was standing room only as residents packed in to express their dismay about a telecommunications mast that had been erected, without any consultation with them, in the children’s skate-board park. Engineers had informed one of them that it was going to be made “5G ready” at the end of May, in time for the music festival.
We are now beginning to receive reports from inside the site of dangerously high levels of EMFs plus bad headaches, nose bleeds, stinging eyes and digestive issues.
5G technology was installed at Glastonbury Festival this year by EE as part of a governmental agenda called 5G Rural First. This is a promotional push dreamed up by urbanite marketeers that purports to be about giving better internet access to country dwellers. In reality, though, good folks have paid £250 a ticket to be used as guinea-pigs in a 1.4 square mile test bed for an untested technology that could have serious implications for their health.
Partners of 5G Rural First include US telecommunications giant Cisco, Microsoft, the BBC and British Telecom, the owners of EE who are bringing 5G to Glastonbury Festival.
5G Rural First also has testbeds on the Orkney Islands and Shropshire and it claims its technology will help dairy cows perform better.
But they are ignoring the evidence of 230 scientists and doctors who are appealing to the World Health Organisation to move the 5G wireless signal from a Group 2B carcinogen to a Group 1, the same as asbestos and arsenic.
They believe that the dangers to health from 5G include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes to the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being. And the damage goes well beyond the human race; there is growing evidence of harmful effects to plants, insects and animals.
So where are the protests to halt this threat to our health and wellbeing?
Well, we cannot turn to Extinction Rebellion for help. Last month’s state-organised protests by their “actorvists” against climate change, which brought central London to a standstill, were to provide “hearts-and-minds” support for the zero-carbon-by-2050 promises made by Theresa May in the dying days of her premiership that, unwittingly or not, will bankrupt the country over 30 years.
One of Extinction Rebellion’s founder directors, Gail Bradbrook, went on to head up Citizen’s Online as a “digital inclusion strategy specialist consulting with a wide range of clients such as EE, London Connects and the Cabinet Office.” There is also a former head of Exxon Mobil on its board as well as Lord Anthony Tudor St. John, a senior consultant to Merrill-Lynch and legal counsel to Shell. Shell is heavily invested in the satellite and aerospace industries which will be involved in the roll-out of 5G.
So what about the Greens? Surely they will be concerned about a new technology that will require the culling of thousands of trees, to successfully transmit its signals? Well, Caroline Lucas and Co were very late to the party. As recently as September last year, she was supporting the “smart agenda”, although the Greens are now talking about conducting a moratorium while the safety risks are assessed.
Glastonbury Town Council, made up largely of Greens, has also been foot-dragging on the issue. It is only now making efforts to catch up with the local grassroots anti-5G movement which had been vigorously trying to draw their attention to the problem for months. However, it is too little, too late. One of the worse EMF hotspots we found on Sunday was when we drove past the entrance to the Chalice Well Gardens at the bottom of Coursing Batch, just before the town.
Glastonbury Town Council is not responsible for the festival site at Pilton, which is in its own parish, and that is why so many of us attended their parish council meeting a few weeks ago. However, it has made no difference.
Michael Eavis, the festival’s farmer founder whose daughter Emily now heads up the four-day event, was leafleted by a local campaigner in Tesco’s the other day.
She said he got annoyed with her and replied:
“Young people are the cause. I bet you have a phone.”
In response, she pulled out of her bag a decidedly unsmart, out-of-date Nokia that, she informed him, was only used for emergencies.
Eavis then told her that he didn’t own a mobile phone. Make of that what you will.
留言列表
